<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On iMacs, Chrome OS and Life in General…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/</link>
	<description>I need a funny tagline</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:45:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: goofydg1</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>goofydg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can relate to having my personal site suffer because of so much writing for others. My site has turned into a graveyard for my twitter stream with an occasional post containing extended thoughts. Still, I take some solace in that those that watch my site still find it useful because of the redirect links to interesting things. At least those that aren&#039;t into twitter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I find that I&#039;m reading quite a bit of your stuff at Mashable. Nice work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can relate to having my personal site suffer because of so much writing for others. My site has turned into a graveyard for my twitter stream with an occasional post containing extended thoughts. Still, I take some solace in that those that watch my site still find it useful because of the redirect links to interesting things. At least those that aren’t into twitter.</p>

<p>I find that I’m reading quite a bit of your stuff at Mashable. Nice work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christina, you got a great price on your iMac&#039;s RAM too — now it&#039;s risen up to $90-100.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing your experiences (enjoying your gift guide in another tab) and if you need help with screencasts, feel free to ping. It&#039;s what I do for a living + playing: http://www.youtube.com/torley&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina, you got a great price on your iMac’s RAM too — now it’s risen up to $90–100.</p>

<p>Thanks for sharing your experiences (enjoying your gift guide in another tab) and if you need help with screencasts, feel free to ping. It’s what I do for a living + playing: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/torley" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/torley</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christina,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since this is LED backlit display, the lighting should be uniform across the entire screen. With IPS, it should also have the consistent colors and lighting no matter which angle you are looking at the screen. Having said that though, I would still trade &quot;yellow tinge&quot; for &quot;slight darkness&quot;, but neither should be there. Most non IPS monitors have more color variations and lighting unevenness so the average user probably won&#039;t notice these issues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am going to try getting replacements for both our i5 and i7s a little later... hopefully the newer batches won&#039;t have these problem. It&#039;s a shame because everything else is working so well! I am already missing the magic mouse that&#039;s been packed up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina,</p>

<p>Since this is LED backlit display, the lighting should be uniform across the entire screen. With IPS, it should also have the consistent colors and lighting no matter which angle you are looking at the screen. Having said that though, I would still trade “yellow tinge” for “slight darkness”, but neither should be there. Most non IPS monitors have more color variations and lighting unevenness so the average user probably won’t notice these issues.</p>

<p>I am going to try getting replacements for both our i5 and i7s a little later… hopefully the newer batches won’t have these problem. It’s a shame because everything else is working so well! I am already missing the magic mouse that’s been packed up.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say I have a low level dislike of Crome - as much as I tend to enjoy most of Googles other stuff, Chrome has not been one of them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I have a low level dislike of Crome — as much as I tend to enjoy most of Googles other stuff, Chrome has not been one of them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Remy (man I need threaded comments), I&#039;ve run that test and here&#039;s what I&#039;ve been able to gather, and I think part of this might be associated with how I view the monitor, so I don&#039;t know how it is in every case -- but while it does appear like there might be some unevenness in the lighting, I&#039;m not getting any yellowish tinge. It does seem a bit darker towards the bottom of the screen, but again, I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s just because of how I view it or what. But at least on this one, no yellowish tinge and if there is more shadow on the bottom, if could be associated with other stuff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly, if my displayport wasn&#039;t borked this thing would be perfect!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remy (man I need threaded comments), I’ve run that test and here’s what I’ve been able to gather, and I think part of this might be associated with how I view the monitor, so I don’t know how it is in every case — but while it does appear like there might be some unevenness in the lighting, I’m not getting any yellowish tinge. It does seem a bit darker towards the bottom of the screen, but again, I don’t know if that’s just because of how I view it or what. But at least on this one, no yellowish tinge and if there is more shadow on the bottom, if could be associated with other stuff.</p>

<p>Honestly, if my displayport wasn’t borked this thing would be perfect!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Justin Sellars said: I have to disagree with your thoughts on netbooks. They do have their place in this run of the mill ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Justin,
I actually think you make a valid point -- I guess what I see happening (and what I think is already happening) is that the netbook &quot;market&quot; as it were is splintering. Sure, you have a very small number of these $200 devices, but most of them are often under-specced at $200 (and by under-specced, I mean they have an 8 GB SSD drive, and frankly, 8 GB doesn&#039;t even offer enough reliable swap for most Linux distros, not to mention running Windows). $280 - $320 is where I see most of them priced, and that&#039;s with your basic N270, 1GB and usually between an 80 - 160GB HD all in varying screen sizes with variable battery life. I&#039;m not saying that those machines aren&#039;t perfectly suitable for taking to class, but as  value proposition, they are disappearing, and here&#039;s why:
So about two months ago, Grant (my fiance), bought a not a netbook, netbook for just under $400. It&#039;s from Acer and has almost an identical form factor as their 11.6&quot; netbook line -- like, I think it actually might be identical for the keyboard;trackpad. It has an LED backlit screen, mutli-touch touchpad, 250GB HD (which he swapped with a 320 he had for even MORE space), a Core Solo processor (considerably more oomph than an Atom), 2 GB of RAM (which he expanded to 4 for almost nothing), Wireless-N, web cam, the works. It even came with a Vista Home Premium license and free Windows 7 Home upgrade. That machine (that had the better battery, I might add) was seriously about $70 more than the Atom variant that had less RAM, a smaller hard drive, the Atom, Win XP, no LED display and the smaller battery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not going to be long before Core Solos and Core 2&#039;s (especially the 45nm Core 2s) become cheap enough to put in low-cost, ultra-portable machines. At that point, you see the market splinter into the sub-$200 category that will be dominated by ARM (and even then, I imagine will probably be sold in large part with wireless contracts) and the ~$400 ultra-portable notebook that gives the space/weight advatages of a nebook but can actually run Windows 7 and play back Hulu without choking, plus handle higher-definition streaming video that a netbook can&#039;t even begin to answer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So yes, I think these lower-cost devices have a place, but I think that the market has shifted to slightly pricier/better performing models rather than going as cheap as possible. And the reason they&#039;ve done that is because I think people have expectations from something that looks like a real computer. When it doesn&#039;t behave that way, they push for more power. That&#039;s why I think Chrome OS devices have to be different. Even if it&#039;s just a marketing difference, it has to be different.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Android, that&#039;s for another post -- but suffice to say I think the platform has tremendous potential, and in actuality, if anyone is getting it right right now, I think it&#039;s HTC, not Motorola. The Droid might be getting all the love because of the screen and because it is using a faster processor, but I think the Sense UI and the other investments HTC has added to their lineup, especially the Hero/Eris is pretty awesome.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Justin Sellars said: I have to disagree with your thoughts on netbooks. They do have their place in this run of the mill …</blockquote>

<p>Justin,
I actually think you make a valid point — I guess what I see happening (and what I think is already happening) is that the netbook “market” as it were is splintering. Sure, you have a very small number of these $200 devices, but most of them are often under-specced at $200 (and by under-specced, I mean they have an 8 GB SSD drive, and frankly, 8 GB doesn’t even offer enough reliable swap for most Linux distros, not to mention running Windows). $280 — $320 is where I see most of them priced, and that’s with your basic N270, 1GB and usually between an 80 — 160GB HD all in varying screen sizes with variable battery life. I’m not saying that those machines aren’t perfectly suitable for taking to class, but as  value proposition, they are disappearing, and here’s why:
So about two months ago, Grant (my fiance), bought a not a netbook, netbook for just under $400. It’s from Acer and has almost an identical form factor as their 11.6″ netbook line — like, I think it actually might be identical for the keyboard;trackpad. It has an LED backlit screen, mutli-touch touchpad, 250GB HD (which he swapped with a 320 he had for even MORE space), a Core Solo processor (considerably more oomph than an Atom), 2 GB of RAM (which he expanded to 4 for almost nothing), Wireless-N, web cam, the works. It even came with a Vista Home Premium license and free Windows 7 Home upgrade. That machine (that had the better battery, I might add) was seriously about $70 more than the Atom variant that had less RAM, a smaller hard drive, the Atom, Win XP, no LED display and the smaller battery.</p>

<p>It’s not going to be long before Core Solos and Core 2’s (especially the 45nm Core 2s) become cheap enough to put in low-cost, ultra-portable machines. At that point, you see the market splinter into the sub-$200 category that will be dominated by ARM (and even then, I imagine will probably be sold in large part with wireless contracts) and the ~$400 ultra-portable notebook that gives the space/weight advatages of a nebook but can actually run Windows 7 and play back Hulu without choking, plus handle higher-definition streaming video that a netbook can’t even begin to answer.</p>

<p>So yes, I think these lower-cost devices have a place, but I think that the market has shifted to slightly pricier/better performing models rather than going as cheap as possible. And the reason they’ve done that is because I think people have expectations from something that looks like a real computer. When it doesn’t behave that way, they push for more power. That’s why I think Chrome OS devices have to be different. Even if it’s just a marketing difference, it has to be different.</p>

<p>As for Android, that’s for another post — but suffice to say I think the platform has tremendous potential, and in actuality, if anyone is getting it right right now, I think it’s HTC, not Motorola. The Droid might be getting all the love because of the screen and because it is using a faster processor, but I think the Sense UI and the other investments HTC has added to their lineup, especially the Hero/Eris is pretty awesome.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Sellars</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Sellars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to disagree with your thoughts on netbooks. They do have their place in this run of the mill electronics filled life. Many of my classmates use netbooks for note taking, basic word processing and surfing the internet. Netbooks are built for one purpose and that is to give basic functionality to the user for very little cost. I can purchase a netbook for $200 maybe a little less and will function exactly how I want it to with regards to office suite programs and surfing the internet, I don&#039;t expect it to handle photoshop or any modern game for that matter. Those looking for more out of a simple device like this needs to just get a laptop and move on with life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wouldn&#039;t mind picking your brain on your thoughts with the Android OS as I&#039;ve recently purchased the HTC Hero and love my phone along with the apps on its OS I&#039;m currently using.  I&#039;d liked to know the flaws you see in the OS itself and such.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with your thoughts on netbooks. They do have their place in this run of the mill electronics filled life. Many of my classmates use netbooks for note taking, basic word processing and surfing the internet. Netbooks are built for one purpose and that is to give basic functionality to the user for very little cost. I can purchase a netbook for $200 maybe a little less and will function exactly how I want it to with regards to office suite programs and surfing the internet, I don’t expect it to handle photoshop or any modern game for that matter. Those looking for more out of a simple device like this needs to just get a laptop and move on with life.</p>

<p>I wouldn’t mind picking your brain on your thoughts with the Android OS as I’ve recently purchased the HTC Hero and love my phone along with the apps on its OS I’m currently using.  I’d liked to know the flaws you see in the OS itself and such.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great review. Did your first iMac have any of the screen noise problems that others have been complaining about? Any high pitched whistle linked to the brightness of the screen? Apple still haven&#039;t admitted to the problem existing, despite lots of customers returning their new iMacs and asking for replacements.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. Did your first iMac have any of the screen noise problems that others have been complaining about? Any high pitched whistle linked to the brightness of the screen? Apple still haven’t admitted to the problem existing, despite lots of customers returning their new iMacs and asking for replacements.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator>James Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2020</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree with yah on Chrome OS, it is such an overhyped product, i mean why and how can it be a next big thing just right now! I do understand the fact total computing off the cloud is pretty innovative but I feel this is too early for such innovation. What if your you want to play something demanding like Crysis and GTA4, are the textures rendered and sent over from the cloud or is it sent over as is. What about the bandwidth then 16GBps per channel? Fine even if we don&#039;t use all that of PCIe so what? Then do they expect we download a dvd everytime we watch it and what about a BDs then! Then what about the fact when we not online? I mean wifi is everywhere and soon WiMax but even then we are still not in a blanket of HiSpeed internet all over, even at the most region you might not get a cell reception. And what if I wanted Firefox or Safari and even hell God forgive me, IE what then? Can i run Photoshop or Visual Studio? No i need a web application to the same. Now, has web dev gone so far as application developed for system? The idea overall is innovative and like you said it should be for a different class of devices I totally agree with that. But the time for Chrome OS a default standard on a desktop is OS or even on the netbook which it will ship with is for now very far fetched.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and btw Christina great article and neat pics of pretty apple at flickr :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with yah on Chrome OS, it is such an overhyped product, i mean why and how can it be a next big thing just right now! I do understand the fact total computing off the cloud is pretty innovative but I feel this is too early for such innovation. What if your you want to play something demanding like Crysis and GTA4, are the textures rendered and sent over from the cloud or is it sent over as is. What about the bandwidth then 16GBps per channel? Fine even if we don’t use all that of PCIe so what? Then do they expect we download a dvd everytime we watch it and what about a BDs then! Then what about the fact when we not online? I mean wifi is everywhere and soon WiMax but even then we are still not in a blanket of HiSpeed internet all over, even at the most region you might not get a cell reception. And what if I wanted Firefox or Safari and even hell God forgive me, IE what then? Can i run Photoshop or Visual Studio? No i need a web application to the same. Now, has web dev gone so far as application developed for system? The idea overall is innovative and like you said it should be for a different class of devices I totally agree with that. But the time for Chrome OS a default standard on a desktop is OS or even on the netbook which it will ship with is for now very far fetched.</p>

<p>and btw Christina great article and neat pics of pretty apple at flickr <img src='http://www.christinawarren.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.christinawarren.com/2009/11/22/imac-27-chrome-os-thoughs/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinawarren.com/?p=253#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christina,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I did not have issues with the mini display port, my 27&quot; does have one major, deal breaking flaw. The screen has a very light (but noticeable) yellow tint (or warmer color temperature) starting from the middle to the bottom of the screen. It is difficult to notice at first, but if you are a graphic artist who stares at pixel by pixel everyday... it&#039;s a very different story.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you can do me a favor, go to this link,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://tapplox.com/imac-led.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are two grey bars on that page created with basic html/css. Color wise they should be identical. But looking closely, on my IPS panel tells me that my iMac display may just well be defective. I am considering to get the 24&quot; ACD if all the new iMacs are like this.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice review, by the way. Nice photos!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina,</p>

<p>While I did not have issues with the mini display port, my 27″ does have one major, deal breaking flaw. The screen has a very light (but noticeable) yellow tint (or warmer color temperature) starting from the middle to the bottom of the screen. It is difficult to notice at first, but if you are a graphic artist who stares at pixel by pixel everyday… it’s a very different story.</p>

<p>If you can do me a favor, go to this link,</p>

<p><a href="http://tapplox.com/imac-led.html" rel="nofollow">http://tapplox.com/imac-led.html</a></p>

<p>There are two grey bars on that page created with basic html/css. Color wise they should be identical. But looking closely, on my IPS panel tells me that my iMac display may just well be defective. I am considering to get the 24″ ACD if all the new iMacs are like this.</p>

<p>Nice review, by the way. Nice photos!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

