For news tips, pitches, speaking engagements or media inquiries: Contact

OS and Life in General…">On iMacs, Chrome OS and Life in General…

My disorganized thoughts about my new iMac 27" i7, Chrome OS and why I haven't been updating my blog...

Man — it’s been for­ever since I updated my blog! I’ve wanted to write more fre­quently, but here’s the sit­u­a­tion: I write on aver­age between 8 and 10 blog posts a day between my full-time job at Mash­able and my side-gig with AMC The­atres (check out the Script to Screen blog here), that’s a lot of words per week. By the end of the day, I’m usu­ally just gen­uinely too tired to write more. Plus, I want to be able to enjoy my evenings with Grant and whatnot.

Given that I’m actu­ally able to call writ­ing my career — which is amaz­ing — I’m pretty OK with the fact that my per­sonal blog gets neglected. But that’s why updates are few and far between — because I’m get­ting to write about tech­nol­ogy and movies every day as part of my job.

OK, so since I last posted, a few things have hap­pened in the world of tech­nol­ogy, let’s go down the list:

  • Apple announced its new prod­uct line, includ­ing what I have been wait­ing for: a Quad-Core iMac, and at 27″ wiht an LED IPS screen no less!
  • I ordered said 27″ iMac i7, waited 18 days of deliv­ery, was in love and beside myself with excite­ment — until I tried to hook it up to a sec­ond mon­i­tor and found out the mini­Dis­play­Port was bro­ken. So my beloved beauty must go back to Apple and they are send­ing me a replace­ment. I won’t get the replace­ment until around the 4th of Decem­ber because the demand is high (and as I said, they didn’t even ship the machines until a good three and a half weeks after they were announced, for the i5/i7s any­way). Apple is let­ting me keep the defec­tive one until then, but I won’t be able to be fully com­fort­able with my new toy for almost two more weeks.
  • Google finally unveiled it’s much hyped Chrome OS and the whole tech­nol­ogy world has got­ten itself into a tizzy over what it is and what it isn’t and what it could be and all kinds of other shit.

So before I talk about Chrome, let me talk about the iMac.

27″ iMac i7 Review, Take One

As I said, I couldn’t help but be like totally, totally dis­ap­pointed that I have to send my beau­ti­ful machine back, espe­cially after wait­ing for it for so long. I bought the 27″ i7 as a 27th birth­day gift to myself and got it just one day after my birthday.

Aside from the mini­Dis­play­Port issue, the machine is amaz­ing. The screen is beyond com­pare — and the thing is fast. How fast? Let’s just say that com­ing off of my two-year old Black­Book, I’m sim­ply amazed at how much faster cer­tain tasks are. If a pro­gram has been opti­mized for multi-cores AT ALL, it really shines. For instance, doing screen­casts of live web video used to be a labo­ri­ous process. Like, it would take hours to export the result from either Cam­ta­sia or Screen­flow. On the i7 it lit­er­ally flies. It’s amaz­ing. I can’t wait for Adobe to come out with Pho­to­shop CS5 that actu­ally takes advan­tage of this stuff. Like­wise, I can’t wait for more and more apps, espe­cially mul­ti­me­dia apps, to really take advan­tage of multi-cores, hyper­thread­ing and other awe­some stuff.

I opted to install an extra 4 GB of RAM myself in the machine (I paid $60 shipped to get the RAM from Newegg, whereas it would have been another $200 or so if I got Apple to do it) and I have to say, the instal­la­tion process couldn’t have been sim­pler. Before I even turned my Mac on for the first time, I put the new RAM, giv­ing me 8 GB of DDR3-1066 RAM. I’m in heaven.

I got a Magic Mouse a week before I got my new iMac, so I was famil­iar with that — but I have to say, the com­bi­na­tion of the screen and the mouse is really nice. I can’t wait for more ges­tures to get writ­ten into the Magic Mouse. I know that a lot of peo­ple I respect have panned the mouse, and the Log­itech MX prob­a­bly is a bet­ter point­ing device, but the Magic Mouse is sexy, easy to use and feels good in the hand. Plus, I have my Wacom tablet if I need to do any pre­cise, pre­cise stuff anyway.

The alum­nium key­board is the same as what I’ve been using for a year with my Mac­Book hooked up to an exter­nal mon­i­tor and it remains a joy to type on.

Sound from the speak­ers is excel­lent, though I’m look­ing at get­ting a sep­a­rate set any­way. The machine is amaz­ingly quiet for all of its horse­power. I mean, accord­ing to the Geek­Bench results, this thing is very closer if not bet­ter than a base level Mac Pro. So I’ve got a Mac Pro (minus the expand­abil­ity, yes, but I don’t care about that more than for RAM) inside one of the nicest dis­plays avail­able on the market.

I really can’t say enough about the screen. I know that once I get my work­ing unit I’m going to really be able to see the dif­fer­ence between my $220 HP w2338h and this beauty — which is why that dis­play will be rel­e­gated to hold­ing my e-mail, Adium and maybe Camp­fire. I’ll leave the big screen for every­thing else.

As for why I need two screens when 27″ is so big? It’s not so much for size, but because I like to seg­ment and sep­a­rate some of my tools. I like hav­ing my mail up at all times, but I don’t want to have to bat­tle with it and other win­dows. On my old setup, my Mac­Book screen sim­ply served as a place for to live. Because the smaller dis­play will now be 23.5″ and 1920x1080, I can put a lot more on it and thus leave my beauty for Text­Mate, Pho­to­shop and web browsers, which are the three pro­grams I have open at almost all times (well that and LittleSnapper).

A lot has been writ­ten about the Apple Tax and the value propo­si­tion and what­not, but I think that with the new iMac lineup, even at the 21.5″ level, but espe­cially when you look at the i5 and i7 machines — it’s hard to argue that you aren’t get­ting your money’s worth.

Yes, I paid $2600 for my com­puter ($2660 with RAM), but I’m get­ting some­thing that I couldn’t get any­where else, and at Dell, two sep­a­rate pieces, with a mon­i­tor that isn’t as good, would cost me MORE money.

I’m in front of a com­puter for at least 8 hours a day (10 is more accu­rate), hav­ing some­thing fast, reli­able and with a great, great screen really makes the dif­fer­ence, I just wish there was a Blu-ray option already. I hate that I can’t use this to watch my grow­ing Blu-ray col­lec­tion. But that’s OK, I have the amaz­ing LG BD 390 Net­work Blu-ray Disc Player for that! Seri­ously, if you are look­ing for a Blu-ray player this Christ­mas and you don’t have a PS3 (or don’t want one), this is the one to get. It has Wireless-N, Net­flix, VUDU and YouTube sup­port (I think Pan­dora is com­ing soon), can con­nect to your PC or Mac or NAS setup to stream media and has great, great qual­ity. $260 for what is almost a com­plete home enter­tain­ment hub.

I’ll do some­thing more in-depth after I get the final iMac in and I trans­fer every­thing over offi­cially (I’m in this weird limbo space now where about 90% of my files and docs are trans­ferred, as well as my most-used apps, but most of my media files are still on other dri­ves and I haven’t installed all my pro­grams. When I fig­ured out the first day I actu­ally was going to use this thing for work that the Dis­play­Port didn’t work, I kind of stopped doing the big trans­fer. I mean, I have to do this again any­way so why bother?

And here’s my unbox­ing gallery. For­give the qual­ity, I couldn’t find my dig­i­tal cam­era and so I had to use my iPhone which is just not good with my office’s lighting.

Pow­ered by Flickr Gallery

Chrome OS Thoughts

This should prob­a­bly just be a sep­a­rate blog post, but I really just wanted to dis­cuss in a non-Mashable set­ting some of my thoughts on Chrome OS. The day it was announced, I quickly got my geek on and com­piled the source image (which first required hav­ing to down­load and install the lat­est Ubuntu and run that in VMWare Fusion 3), which wasn’t dif­fi­cult, but was long and laborious.

Then I had to cre­ate the VMWare image — fig­ure out how to get the file from my VM to my desk­top (not as sim­ple as you’d think — I ended up just Drop­Box­ing it which was faster) and then cre­ated a new VM from that image.

After play­ing with it a bit, I did like 5 screen­casts, and sadly, this was the best take — despite my umming, uhs and actual tech­ni­cal prob­lems. What­ever, I was on a dead­line. I will say my ass-busting paid off because we had a hands-on first look at least 6 hours before any other major site (or minor site that I could find). I also got to flex my geek mus­cles (hey, com­pil­ing the ker­nel and build­ing the image wasn’t dif­fi­cult, but come on, that’s still totally geeky!), which is always nice.

So my first thoughts, which I shared on Twit­ter, was how dis­ap­pointed I was that what we saw in Google’s demo wasn’t what the source was. It’s not that that isn’t com­pletely and totally typ­i­cal, but it just makes even con­tem­plat­ing devel­op­ing any­thing for Chrome OS hard if you can’t even get a true base­line of how stuff works.

But the bot­tom line is this, every­one calls this a big threat to the desk­top as we know it and rep­re­sen­ta­tive of a big par­a­digm shift and blah blah blah, and you know, in another 10 years, that might be true — hell in 5 we might be closer to fruition, but as it stands right now, I can see Chrome OS suc­ceed­ing, but where it will suc­ceed will be in a com­pletely sep­a­rate and new class of device.

Gru­ber made a com­ment about how Chrome might be con­sid­ered as a bicy­cle that replaces that sec­ond, rarely used car — and you know, that would be a very Larry Elli­son way of look­ing at stuff — and maybe some­day that will be true. How­ever, right now, I don’t see it as a bicy­cle replac­ing a car — I don’t think it’s robust enough to be a bike. I think it’s a VESPA you get to tool around in but that you don’t ever seri­ously con­sider using for more than just cer­tain things. It isn’t going to give you the flex­i­bil­ity of a bike, in terms of where you can take it (sub­ways, wind­ing trails, var­i­ous ter­rains) or give you the exer­cise ben­e­fits, but it is a fun excur­sion and can often get you some­place faster than a car or a bike could depend­ing on where you are and what you are try­ing to get to.

For the fore­see­able future, I don’t think I see Chrome OS as some­thing — that at least as it exists now and as it will exist accord­ing to Google’s demo — as some­thing that even net­book own­ers — and net­book own­ers are used to mak­ing lots of com­pro­mises for per­ceived price/weight/convenience advan­tages — would be will­ing to com­pro­mise and use with any frequency.

This is why:

First, while Chrome OS and Android are often com­pared and con­flated (and maybe even­tu­ally they will even morph into the same prod­uct), they are very dif­fer­ent. Android, while deeply flawed (and I say that as some­one who was a strong advo­cate and wants it to suc­ceed if only to offer Apple real com­pe­ti­tion in the mobile space) in many of the ways it is exe­cuted, is still a fully robust plat­form. I may not like the default UI deci­sions, I may think the deci­sion to basi­cally take JIT, do some­thing in the com­piler so that it isn’t JIT by the legal def­i­n­i­tion, is stu­pid because I think Java is what is really lim­it­ing a lot of the devel­op­ment ideas and inno­va­tions and I might ques­tion the already splin­ter­ing mar­ket of sub-Android brands, but Android is a platform.

Right now, Chrome is not a plat­form, it’s a thin client built into a Linux ker­nel. It has the poten­tial to do web mul­ti­me­dia extremely well — espe­cially with Flash and Sil­verlight both get­ting more into uti­liz­ing GPU and hard­ware accel­er­a­tion — and the web in gen­eral very well, but despite our reliance on the web, the web still isn’t every­thing we do with com­put­ing. Don’t get me wrong, I could not sur­vive with­out some sort of Inter­net access. I mean, I could lit­er­ally, but I couldn’t work and most of my com­mu­ni­ca­tion meth­ods would be severely limited.

That said, I’m writ­ing this entry in Mars Edit, not in WordPress’s win­dow, because I both don’t like and don’t trust Word­Press not to crash on me. I write my Mash­able and AMC posts in Text­Mate (and Mash­able uses Word­Press, but the dif­fer­ent link­ing and other stuff I like to do works bet­ter in Text­Mate, whereas I pre­fer Mars Edit for my per­sonal writ­ing) for the same rea­sons — and because I get added func­tion­al­ity that just isn’t avail­able in a web-based text edi­tor yet. Maybe some­day, but not today. I do all of my graph­ics work, even light stuff, in Pho­to­shop. I edit my pho­tos in Aper­ture or Light­Room. Granted, I’m not the aver­age user, but I would still rather my mother use iPhoto than Picasa or Picnik.

Google actu­ally talked about sta­bil­ity and secu­rity as a perk when it comes to Chrome, but as I said on Twit­ter, in the more than two years that I have used Mac OS X full-time, I can count on one hand the num­ber of times I have actu­ally LOST data when it wasn’t my own fault (like when I’ve deleted my iTunes library not once, but twice — or when I’ve incor­rectly closed a win­dow with­out sav­ing). How­ever, I can’t even count how many times I’ve had web browsers, be it Fire­fox, Safari, Camino, Opera, Inter­net Explorer or even Google Chrome crash on me and take every­thing I was work­ing on with it.

Fire­fox is often the nas­ti­est cul­prit for that one — though that’s on the Mac, on the PC Fire­fox is much more sta­ble — but even Safari pre 10.6.2 was pretty crash-happy too. Even Chrome, which is designed to like kill one win­dow not the whole browser, often doesn’t do that — at least in my tests. So if I’m going to rely on any­thing to keep my data for me after a crash, it’s not going to be a web browser. Sorry.

Then there’s the issue of speed. Chrome is going to be fast because a) there’s almost noth­ing to it and b) they are going to require it to use SSD dri­ves in the begin­ning. Now that’s smart, but that’s only part of what defines speed for users.

It’s pretty much accepted that the iPhone 3GS is one of the fastest smart­phones on the mar­ket. The N900 may or may not be faster, the Droid is about the same speed, though the iPhone loads web pages faster when the net­work isn’t a defin­ing fac­tor. The iPhone 3GS is no slouch in the speed depart­ment, but even on WiFi, load­ing web pages can some­times take a bit of time. This doesn’t bother me because I under­stand that my phone is not going to be as fast as my com­puter. The smaller size of the screen and the com­pact nature make it totally easy to ratio­nal­ize and jus­tify dif­fer­ences in speed.

Here’s where net­books end up caus­ing their own­ers prob­lems. The net­book has bet­ter hard­ware than the iPhone, but because it has a big­ger screen a big­ger key­board (and the screens and key­boards are get­ting big­ger and big­ger all the time), peo­ple expect it to be faster than it is. Thus, you get peo­ple want­ing more from the device than it can offer. That’s why net­books, at least Atom-based net­books are prob­a­bly going to dis­ap­pear sooner rather than later. On the low-end you’ll have ARM and on the higher-end, you’ll just have low-priced, light­weight actual lap­tops. Grant has an Acer that has a Core Solo and can take up to 4 GB of RAM, that thing is great — and was only a lit­tle bit more (we’re talk­ing under $100) more than a net­book. And it came with Win­dows 7 Home Premium!

Any­way, I think the push for ARM in net­book style com­put­ers is going to be met with utter dis­ap­point­ment from con­sumers — espe­cially if Flash isn’t hard­ware accel­er­ated when they launch. Since this is Chrome’s tar­get, I think that tra­di­tional lap­top styled devices are not going to work.

This is what I see: Some­thing like a tablet but with a more defined pur­pose: like call it a media pad. Some­thing you could use as a remote con­trol, for instance — an eBook reader (that isn’t as good as eInk) and a visual TV guide. Yeah, you can watch online con­tent and surf the web, but it’s designed to sit on your sofa and be like what we use phones for now — but big­ger and with the under­stand­ing that you need to be online at all times.

In any event, as Chrome OS stands now, it really isn’t use­able in any test form, other than for shits and gig­gles, but the fact that it exists is pretty cool.

And yes — at long last, the mam­moth blog entry comes to a close.

I’m out!


Alltop, all the cool kids (and me)

TwitterCounter for @film_girl



November 2009
« Sep   Dec »

12 people have left comments

tony­by­noe - Gravatar

tony­by­noe said:

This could have eas­ily been 3 sep­a­rate blog post, you some­how rolled them all into one. Sorry you’ll have to return your new iMac, oth­er­wise your post could’ve been much longer, as you would’ve been able to go into much more detail on the per­for­mance, ooohs, ahhs & blaahs. When you get the replace­ment, do a fol­low up post to this one, only just write about the mac in that post. I couldn’t agree with you more about how dis­ap­point­ing the Google Chrome OS is when it was revealed last week and I watched that vid you did on Mash­able on said OS. That vid under­lined the dashed hopes of many who antic­i­pated another killer cre­ation from Google. Finally, don’t worry about the large gap in between post on your own blog. This is under­stand­able given the work­load you now have to endure.

Posted on: November 22, 2009 at 11:26 pmQuote this Comment
Christina - Gravatar

Christina said:

Thanks for read­ing Tony! I plan on doing a fully-formed Mac post as soon as I get the replace­ment. Had I known this entry was going to turn out how it did, I think I would have done it as two sep­a­rate posts — but by the time I got to the end, I didn’t feel like rewrit­ing the begin­ning. But I’ll totally do a sep­a­rate iMac post once I get the new one.

Chrome really was a dis­ap­point­ment, and for me, it’s not because it’s so new, it’s because it was so over­sold — and Google needs to take a lot of that respon­si­bil­ity. That hasn’t stopped the pun­dits from call­ing it the next big thing, and like I said, it very well could be — but I think it’s place will be on a dif­fer­ent, new class of device, not on the desktop.

Posted on: November 22, 2009 at 11:38 pmQuote this Comment
Remy - Gravatar

Remy said:


While I did not have issues with the mini dis­play port, my 27″ does have one major, deal break­ing flaw. The screen has a very light (but notice­able) yel­low tint (or warmer color tem­per­a­ture) start­ing from the mid­dle to the bot­tom of the screen. It is dif­fi­cult to notice at first, but if you are a graphic artist who stares at pixel by pixel every­day… it’s a very dif­fer­ent story.

If you can do me a favor, go to this link,

There are two grey bars on that page cre­ated with basic html/css. Color wise they should be iden­ti­cal. But look­ing closely, on my IPS panel tells me that my iMac dis­play may just well be defec­tive. I am con­sid­er­ing to get the 24″ ACD if all the new iMacs are like this.

Nice review, by the way. Nice photos!

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 12:14 amQuote this Comment
James Sarkar - Gravatar

James Sarkar said:

I com­pletely agree with yah on Chrome OS, it is such an over­hyped prod­uct, i mean why and how can it be a next big thing just right now! I do under­stand the fact total com­put­ing off the cloud is pretty inno­v­a­tive but I feel this is too early for such inno­va­tion. What if your you want to play some­thing demand­ing like Cry­sis and GTA4, are the tex­tures ren­dered and sent over from the cloud or is it sent over as is. What about the band­width then 16GBps per chan­nel? Fine even if we don’t use all that of PCIe so what? Then do they expect we down­load a dvd every­time we watch it and what about a BDs then! Then what about the fact when we not online? I mean wifi is every­where and soon WiMax but even then we are still not in a blan­ket of HiS­peed inter­net all over, even at the most region you might not get a cell recep­tion. And what if I wanted Fire­fox or Safari and even hell God for­give me, IE what then? Can i run Pho­to­shop or Visual Stu­dio? No i need a web appli­ca­tion to the same. Now, has web dev gone so far as appli­ca­tion devel­oped for sys­tem? The idea over­all is inno­v­a­tive and like you said it should be for a dif­fer­ent class of devices I totally agree with that. But the time for Chrome OS a default stan­dard on a desk­top is OS or even on the net­book which it will ship with is for now very far fetched.

and btw Christina great arti­cle and neat pics of pretty apple at flickr :D

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 12:26 amQuote this Comment
Alex - Gravatar

Alex said:

Great review. Did your first iMac have any of the screen noise prob­lems that oth­ers have been com­plain­ing about? Any high pitched whis­tle linked to the bright­ness of the screen? Apple still haven’t admit­ted to the prob­lem exist­ing, despite lots of cus­tomers return­ing their new iMacs and ask­ing for replacements.

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 4:54 amQuote this Comment
Justin Sel­l­ars - Gravatar

Justin Sel­l­ars said:

I have to dis­agree with your thoughts on net­books. They do have their place in this run of the mill elec­tron­ics filled life. Many of my class­mates use net­books for note tak­ing, basic word pro­cess­ing and surf­ing the inter­net. Net­books are built for one pur­pose and that is to give basic func­tion­al­ity to the user for very lit­tle cost. I can pur­chase a net­book for $200 maybe a lit­tle less and will func­tion exactly how I want it to with regards to office suite pro­grams and surf­ing the inter­net, I don’t expect it to han­dle pho­to­shop or any mod­ern game for that mat­ter. Those look­ing for more out of a sim­ple device like this needs to just get a lap­top and move on with life.

I wouldn’t mind pick­ing your brain on your thoughts with the Android OS as I’ve recently pur­chased the HTC Hero and love my phone along with the apps on its OS I’m cur­rently using. I’d liked to know the flaws you see in the OS itself and such.

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 7:07 amQuote this Comment
Christina War­ren - Gravatar

Christina War­ren said:

Justin Sel­l­ars said: I have to dis­agree with your thoughts on net­books. They do have their place in this run of the mill …

Justin, I actu­ally think you make a valid point — I guess what I see hap­pen­ing (and what I think is already hap­pen­ing) is that the net­book “mar­ket” as it were is splin­ter­ing. Sure, you have a very small num­ber of these $200 devices, but most of them are often under-specced at $200 (and by under-specced, I mean they have an 8 GB SSD drive, and frankly, 8 GB doesn’t even offer enough reli­able swap for most Linux dis­tros, not to men­tion run­ning Win­dows). $280 — $320 is where I see most of them priced, and that’s with your basic N270, 1GB and usu­ally between an 80 — 160GB HD all in vary­ing screen sizes with vari­able bat­tery life. I’m not say­ing that those machines aren’t per­fectly suit­able for tak­ing to class, but as value propo­si­tion, they are dis­ap­pear­ing, and here’s why: So about two months ago, Grant (my fiance), bought a not a net­book, net­book for just under $400. It’s from Acer and has almost an iden­ti­cal form fac­tor as their 11.6″ net­book line — like, I think it actu­ally might be iden­ti­cal for the keyboard;trackpad. It has an LED back­lit screen, mutli-touch touch­pad, 250GB HD (which he swapped with a 320 he had for even MORE space), a Core Solo proces­sor (con­sid­er­ably more oomph than an Atom), 2 GB of RAM (which he expanded to 4 for almost noth­ing), Wireless-N, web cam, the works. It even came with a Vista Home Pre­mium license and free Win­dows 7 Home upgrade. That machine (that had the bet­ter bat­tery, I might add) was seri­ously about $70 more than the Atom vari­ant that had less RAM, a smaller hard drive, the Atom, Win XP, no LED dis­play and the smaller battery.

It’s not going to be long before Core Solos and Core 2’s (espe­cially the 45nm Core 2s) become cheap enough to put in low-cost, ultra-portable machines. At that point, you see the mar­ket splin­ter into the sub-$200 cat­e­gory that will be dom­i­nated by ARM (and even then, I imag­ine will prob­a­bly be sold in large part with wire­less con­tracts) and the ~$400 ultra-portable note­book that gives the space/weight advatages of a nebook but can actu­ally run Win­dows 7 and play back Hulu with­out chok­ing, plus han­dle higher-definition stream­ing video that a net­book can’t even begin to answer.

So yes, I think these lower-cost devices have a place, but I think that the mar­ket has shifted to slightly pricier/better per­form­ing mod­els rather than going as cheap as pos­si­ble. And the rea­son they’ve done that is because I think peo­ple have expec­ta­tions from some­thing that looks like a real com­puter. When it doesn’t behave that way, they push for more power. That’s why I think Chrome OS devices have to be dif­fer­ent. Even if it’s just a mar­ket­ing dif­fer­ence, it has to be different.

As for Android, that’s for another post — but suf­fice to say I think the plat­form has tremen­dous poten­tial, and in actu­al­ity, if any­one is get­ting it right right now, I think it’s HTC, not Motorola. The Droid might be get­ting all the love because of the screen and because it is using a faster proces­sor, but I think the Sense UI and the other invest­ments HTC has added to their lineup, espe­cially the Hero/Eris is pretty awesome.

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 7:42 amQuote this Comment
Christina - Gravatar

Christina said:

Remy (man I need threaded com­ments), I’ve run that test and here’s what I’ve been able to gather, and I think part of this might be asso­ci­ated with how I view the mon­i­tor, so I don’t know how it is in every case — but while it does appear like there might be some uneven­ness in the light­ing, I’m not get­ting any yel­low­ish tinge. It does seem a bit darker towards the bot­tom of the screen, but again, I don’t know if that’s just because of how I view it or what. But at least on this one, no yel­low­ish tinge and if there is more shadow on the bot­tom, if could be asso­ci­ated with other stuff.

Hon­estly, if my dis­play­port wasn’t borked this thing would be perfect!

Posted on: November 23, 2009 at 9:33 amQuote this Comment
Robert - Gravatar

Robert said:

I have to say I have a low level dis­like of Crome — as much as I tend to enjoy most of Googles other stuff, Chrome has not been one of them.

Posted on: November 24, 2009 at 4:25 amQuote this Comment
Remy - Gravatar

Remy said:


Since this is LED back­lit dis­play, the light­ing should be uni­form across the entire screen. With IPS, it should also have the con­sis­tent col­ors and light­ing no mat­ter which angle you are look­ing at the screen. Hav­ing said that though, I would still trade “yel­low tinge” for “slight dark­ness”, but nei­ther should be there. Most non IPS mon­i­tors have more color vari­a­tions and light­ing uneven­ness so the aver­age user prob­a­bly won’t notice these issues.

I am going to try get­ting replace­ments for both our i5 and i7s a lit­tle later… hope­fully the newer batches won’t have these prob­lem. It’s a shame because every­thing else is work­ing so well! I am already miss­ing the magic mouse that’s been packed up.

Posted on: November 24, 2009 at 3:50 pmQuote this Comment
Tor­ley - Gravatar

Tor­ley said:

Christina, you got a great price on your iMac’s RAM too — now it’s risen up to $90–100.

Thanks for shar­ing your expe­ri­ences (enjoy­ing your gift guide in another tab) and if you need help with screen­casts, feel free to ping. It’s what I do for a liv­ing + play­ing:

Posted on: December 5, 2009 at 7:02 pmQuote this Comment
goofydg1 - Gravatar

goofydg1 said:

I can relate to hav­ing my per­sonal site suf­fer because of so much writ­ing for oth­ers. My site has turned into a grave­yard for my twit­ter stream with an occa­sional post con­tain­ing extended thoughts. Still, I take some solace in that those that watch my site still find it use­ful because of the redi­rect links to inter­est­ing things. At least those that aren’t into twitter.

I find that I’m read­ing quite a bit of your stuff at Mash­able. Nice work.

Posted on: December 10, 2009 at 3:04 pmQuote this Comment