christinawarren.com

For news tips, pitches, speaking engagements or media inquiries: Contact

The Oscars 2009: Predictions/Thoughts

Fork and Screen Well, as expect­ed, yesterday’s Best Pic­ture Show­case was AWESOME. My mom and I had a great time and Grant joined us for the first two films.

Because they moved the Show­case to a larg­er audi­to­ri­um, there was a prob­lem get­ting the first film (Milk) ready to show on time, so they had to switch it with The Read­er instead (and we watched Milk sec­ond). This actu­al­ly worked out quite well because Grant had no inter­est see­ing The Read­er and prob­a­bly would have left after Milk. As it turned out, The Read­er was fan­tas­tic and Grant is real­ly glad he stayed.

The Read­er was a real sur­prise. I had want­ed to avoid it because it seemed trite and over­ly praised, and frankly, seemed as if it would bore me. Far from it. The film asks real­ly inter­est­ing ques­tions about guilt, com­plic­i­ty, love and for­give­ness. The idea of moral­i­ty as opposed to the sys­tem of law was jux­ta­posed against a just post-WWII Ger­many, where in the decades just after the war, the coun­try was still strug­gling to deal with the Holo­caust and each individual’s com­plic­i­ty in the sys­tem. To be clear, it’s not a Holo­caust film — it goes far beyond that — but that was the per­fect back­drop for this type of film, as it fit so well with the over­all mes­sage.

Kate Winslet was astound­ing and David Kross who plays a young Ralph Fiennes (and looks so much like he could actu­al­ly BE a young Ralph Fiennes that the cast­ing direc­tor should total­ly win some seri­ous awards) was phe­nom­e­nal, espe­cial­ly for such a young actor. Kate’s per­for­mance was nuanced and sto­ic and sold more on her expres­sions and her eyes rather than the words that she spoke. Real­ly, real­ly excel­lent.

Of the five, The Read­er was the most thought-pro­vok­ing in a sense; if I need­ed to write an aca­d­e­m­ic essay or a jour­nal sub­mis­sion on a nom­i­nee, I’d choose The Read­er because there was so much tex­tu­al com­plex­i­ty. Like almost every oth­er film nom­i­nat­ed for Best Pic­ture, it was an adap­ta­tion, and while I haven’t read the book, I know want to.

Milk, was unsur­pris­ing­ly excel­lent. One of my all-time favorite doc­u­men­taries is The Times of Har­vey Milk and Milk is essen­tial­ly a dra­mat­ic reen­act­ment of that sto­ry, with some addi­tion­al back­ground details of Harvey’s love life and more on his inter­ac­tions with Dan White. Hav­ing watched the doc­u­men­tary so many times (I think I dis­cov­ered it on IFC or Sun­dance a few months before the 25th Anniver­sary DVD was released, the first home video release of the doc if I recall cor­rect­ly), I was famil­iar with the play­ers and the sto­ry, so I can’t real­ly judge how well the film fleshed out some peo­ple and some char­ac­ters — but I think it did a good job, as my moth­er, who has nev­er seen the doc (I showed it to Grant last sum­mer), real­ly enjoyed it and was riv­et­ed by the sto­ry.

Gus Van Sant is still dead to me because of the Psy­cho fias­co, that said — this came as close as any­thing to absolv­ing him from that great­est of cin­e­mat­ic sins.

Sean Penn has received the bulk of the act­ing buzz around the film, but I real­ly think Josh Brolin was the real stand­out. Obvi­ous­ly, Har­vey IS the film — and Penn’s per­for­mance is both excel­lent and exact­ing. The voice, the affec­ta­tions and man­ner­isms were spot on with the real guy. That said, Josh Brolin’s beyond eerie trans­for­ma­tion into a spit­ting image of the real Dan White was what took me aback when I first saw the trail­er for Milk last year (I regret we weren’t able to see it when it was in the­aters — so much was going on at the end of the year though) and it was an incred­i­ble per­for­mance by an actor that has real­ly come out of nowhere in the last two years (first No Coun­try for Old Men, now Milk and W.) to tran­si­tion from “son of a famous guy” to a real­ly stand-out actor in his own right.

James Fran­co was real­ly impres­sive, and Emille Hirsch, who I can­not stand was also quite good. The film felt authen­tic and the mix­ture of the real home movies from the ‘70s with the recre­at­ed clips were just awe­some. End­ing with the actu­al footage of the can­dle­light vig­il across San Fan­cis­co from Novem­ber, 1978 was the per­fect, per­fect touch. That imagery was the most haunt­ing and mem­o­rable part of the doc­u­men­tary and it was a per­fect way to end the film.

The Curi­ous Case of Ben­jamin But­ton was an exer­cise in prov­ing me to NEVER DOUBT DAVID FINCHER. Now, I love me some David Finch­er, LOVE, but I let the “it’s three hours and bor­ing and blah blah blah” bull­shit turn me off the movie. Again, fuck­ing excel­lent. The pac­ing was great, the cin­e­matog­ra­phy was superb and although I think it is going to get shut-out of every­thing big, if it doesn’t win Best Make­up, there’s a fuck­ing prob­lem.

Cate Blanchett who I nor­mal­ly can’t stand was excel­lent. Brad Pitt was great and the sup­port­ing cast of char­ac­ters was equal­ly won­der­ful. Now, I’ve heard a lot of For­rest Gump com­par­isons, but that’s an insult to Finch­er, et. al. Zemekis is a direc­tor, Finch­er is an auteur. there’s a dif­fer­ence in skill, in tal­ent and in scope. The lessons of love and loss and to quote Pony Boy by way of Frost, “noth­ing gold ever stay­ing,” were real­ly remark­able.

It was so dif­fer­ent from a typ­i­cal Finch­er film, both in sub­stance and even in style. His char­ac­ter­is­tic cin­e­matog­ra­phy flour­ish­es were there, but the col­or palette was more expan­sive and lush — and not just dark.

It was real­ly, real­ly sol­id and while I don’t want to see it again imme­di­ate­ly, I’ll total­ly watch it when the DVD is released with Grant.

Slum­dog Mil­lion­aire is the big pick to win, and for good rea­son. It is dif­fer­ent, it is touch­ing, it is uplift­ing — it’s just a great movie. The film has the full range of emo­tions, and none feel forced — and the fact that Dan­ny Boyle direct­ed such a film is astound­ing. The actors were amaz­ing, espe­cial­ly for peo­ple so young. The child actors espe­cial­ly were just amaz­ing. And the girl who plays Lati­ka — what a phe­nom­e­nal beau­ty. Like, she’s the Angeli­na Jolie/Vivien Leigh/Grace Kel­ley kind of beau­ty — like total­ly trans­fix­ing and per­fect.

I don’t want to say too much because although the sto­ry has com­plex­i­ties and is cer­tain­ly not shal­low, even going into the premise ruins a cer­tain ele­ment of the flow. You know how the film is going to end as soon as it starts (the title tells you), but the jour­ney to get there is great. And the music fuck­ing rocks.

Frost/Nixon was bet­ter than I had expect­ed, but I still think The Dark Knight, The Wrestler or a host of oth­er films could have claimed its spot for Best Pic­ture and Best Direc­tor and Best Adapt­ed Screen­play nods. I read the play, and the film played bet­ter than the stage direc­tions read. My only real crit­i­cism in a sense is that Nixon came off as trag­ic, sym­pa­thet­ic and human. And that’s fine, but I don’t think that was real­ly the inten­tion of the play or the film. Frost/Nixon suc­ceed­ed where Oliv­er Stone’s Nixon utter­ly failed.

Part of that is because they got the right actor to play Nixon. Noth­ing against Sir Antho­ny Hop­kins, but he was just a hor­ri­ble choice for Stone’s film. But Nixon comes across as sym­pa­thet­ic, and I don’t know how I feel about that. The man did so much harm in the name of pow­er, author­i­ty and win­ning a polit­i­cal game. Until George W. Bush, he was the most cor­rupt of all our Pres­i­dents. I don’t real­ly like feel­ing sym­pa­thet­ic towards him, espe­cial­ly after the pletho­ra of Nixon books I’ve read over the years. I’ve read so many books, lis­tened to many of the tapes, watched doc­u­men­taries — it was odd that this film, which isn’t sub­stan­tive­ly very strong, would make me uncom­fort­able in see­ing the guy as human.

OK — so Pre­dic­tions:

Best Actress

Kate Winslet

Best Actor

I want Mick­ey Rourke to get it, I think he deserves it — and though Sean Penn has a cer­tain advan­tage, I think the raw­ness of Mickey’s per­for­mance out­weighs the accu­ra­cy of Sean’s Method per­fec­tion.

Best Sup­port­ing Actor

Heath Ledger will sure­ly be the third posthu­mous Oscar win­ner. I’m not sure how I feel about that. He was bril­liant in Dark Knight, but I’d like to see Josh Brolin win.

Best Sup­port­ing Actress

It’s a toss-up between Amy Adams and Vio­la Davis for Doubt. Still, Maris­sa Tomei Pene­lope Cruz have a chance, toss-up.

Best Orig­i­nal Screen­play

WALL-E should get this. I hope it does.

Best Adapt­ed Screen­play

Slum­dog Mil­lion­aire

Best Direc­tor

I’ll say Dan­ny Boyle, but I’m unsure — David Finch­er might pull it out.

Best Pic­ture

Slum­dog Mil­lion­aire

Woo — I’m done!

Feeds-

Alltop, all the cool kids (and me)

Instagram

Follow me on App.net

Calendar-

February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

8 people have left comments

Lisa - Gravatar

Lisa said:

Great review. i’ve been cram­ming all the best pic­ture flicks since 4am last night. need­less to say, i hope make­up can cov­er up these mas­sive bags. :S i’m going to be talk­ing Oscars all night so I’ll save my pre­dic­tions to the show. I’d love it if you could come chat. after all you are film_girl 😀

Posted on: February 22, 2009 at 6:00 pmQuote this Comment
Bri­an Parks - Gravatar

Bri­an Parks said:

Come on now. Heath com­plete­ly dis­ap­peared into that role. His was the best per­for­mance I have seen in the past 2 year.

Posted on: February 22, 2009 at 6:04 pmQuote this Comment
Mike Gon­za­lez - Gravatar

Mike Gon­za­lez said:

Great post. Agree about most of your thoughts, though I’m not ure I love Slum­dog Mil­lion­aire for best pic­ture. I think it’s going to win, but maybe not my per­son­al choice.

Also, I think you meant “Lati­ka”, not “Zami­ka”. I agree, Frei­da Pin­to is aston­ish­ing­ly pret­ty.

Posted on: February 22, 2009 at 6:08 pmQuote this Comment
Dharm - Gravatar

Dharm said:

Wasn’t going to write a com­ment, but then read­ing the “Com­ment Guide­lines” forced me to give it a shot! I have nev­er seen such a detailed com­ment guide­lines, many times i won­der whether a href will work or not. I think this will qual­i­fy as Off-top­ic, but not inap­pro­pri­ate. U won’t have to delete my ass tho.

Btw, your Oscar pre­dic­tions were on the tar­get most­ly. Well done.

Ok, test­ing ,

One sug­ges­tion tho: the com­ments are way below the con­tent due to right col­umn length. You might want to bring com­ments inside the div id="column-left" from the cur­rent div id="main-lower-content"

Posted on: February 23, 2009 at 6:29 amQuote this Comment
Michael - Gravatar

Michael said:

Although I’m not a huge fan of dra­mat­ic movies (unless you count action thrillers as dra­mas!), your post actu­al­ly made me inter­est­ed in see­ing a few of last night’s best pic­ture nom­i­na­tions. Great post.

And are you proud of your picks this morn­ing? You should be… Great accu­ra­cy!

-MJT

Posted on: February 23, 2009 at 9:27 amQuote this Comment
Chris Coyi­er - Gravatar

Chris Coyi­er said:

Dang you did pret­ty good girl. I think Rourke should have got­ten it too.

Posted on: February 25, 2009 at 12:06 pmQuote this Comment
Mike Doe - Gravatar

Mike Doe said:

Christi­na, fan­tas­tic job as always! I’m a lit­tle late to the Oscars par­ty, but I always love when you put on your @filmgirl hat and go into movie crit­ic mode. 🙂

Posted on: March 8, 2009 at 1:49 pmQuote this Comment
w4onecom - Gravatar

w4onecom said:

nice info 😀

Posted on: March 8, 2009 at 7:31 pmQuote this Comment